Four CentsMedia
Free tool · No sign-up · Nothing is sent to us

Work out what to charge

A starting rate card built from published benchmarks, adjusted for your niche, your engagement and where your audience actually lives. The whole calculation is shown, because a rate you cannot defend is a rate you will lose.

Use an average across your last ten to twelve posts, excluding giveaways and anything that went unusually viral. Those flatter the number and a brand checking your account will notice.

Your starting rate card
$0
per post on your own audience
Put these rates on the roster

Carries your numbers into the application so you do not retype them. You can edit every one before you send it, and nothing is submitted until you do.

How the numbers are worked out

Nothing here is a black box, because a rate you cannot explain is a rate you will lose in a negotiation. Four things go into it.

1. A published benchmark band for your tier

The starting range comes from commonly cited per-post bands: roughly $50 to $250 for nano creators, $250 to $1,500 for micro, and $1,500 to $5,000 for mid-tier, in Canadian dollars, for an organic post with no advertising usage attached.

2. A multiplier for your niche

Niche moves price more than follower count does. The multiplier applied to your category is shown with your result, and it ranges from about 0.85 for categories where content is inexpensive to produce and creators are plentiful, up to 2.0 for personal finance, where the audience is worth considerably more per head and far fewer people can credibly make the content.

3. An adjustment for how engaged your audience is

Engagement is compared against the normal band for your tier rather than a flat threshold, because rates fall as accounts grow and that is normal rather than a problem. Across a 2026 dataset of 3,125 creators, median engagement was around 4.4% on TikTok and 2.7% on Instagram for nano accounts, falling to roughly 1.6% and 1.3% at the 100,000 to 500,000 mark. Sitting well above your tier's median moves your rate up. Sitting well below moves it down, and is worth investigating before a brand does it for you.

4. Whether your audience can buy the product

An audience outside the market a brand sells to is worth less to that brand, however engaged it is. This is the adjustment creators most often forget, and it is the one brands check first.

What the calculation deliberately ignores: how good your work is, how reliably you hit a deadline, whether you have a waiting list, and whether you are the only person in a small niche. All four move a rate upward and none of them can be inferred from numbers. If several brands are already asking, charge more than this says.

The add-ons that matter most

Almost every underpaid creator job is underpaid because these were bundled into the base fee silently. Price them as separate lines from the start.

  • Paid usage. A brand running your content as an advert is a separate licence from posting it. Commonly adds 20 to 50 per cent, priced by how long the window runs.
  • Whitelisting. Ads running from your own handle, so the social proof stays attached to you. Separate again and higher. Around half of creators charge extra for this, and the half that do not are leaving money behind.
  • Exclusivity. Not working with a competitor for a period. A thirty-day window in a narrow category commonly adds 15 to 25 per cent. Several months across a broad category can cost more than the original fee, and should.
  • Extra hooks and aspect ratios. Three openings to the same video is three pieces of work. Each aspect ratio usually needs its own export and often its own reframe.
  • Rush. Anything under seventy-two hours displaces other work. Commonly 20 to 50 per cent.
  • Raw footage. Cheap to agree at the start, expensive to hand over afterwards. Decide deliberately rather than by accident.

Defending the number

When a brand pushes back, the useful move is to ask what their budget is rather than to guess downward. Small brands are frequently not trying to squeeze you. They have two thousand dollars for the quarter and genuinely no idea what that buys, and once you know the number you can shape a job that fits it.

What not to do is quietly absorb scope to protect the headline price. That teaches the client the extras are free, and you will be doing it on every job afterwards. Reduce what you deliver, not what you charge.

One number worth having in your head: roughly forty per cent of creators report being paid late or not at all for sponsored work, and about one in ten have never been paid for at least one completed job. That is not a reason to charge less. It is a reason to get the fee, the payment date and the usage window in writing before anything is shot.

Questions

Is this what I should actually charge?

It is a defensible starting point, not a verdict. It is built from published benchmark bands adjusted for your niche and your engagement, and the whole calculation is shown below so you can argue with any part of it. What it cannot know is how good your work is, how fast you turn things round, or whether three brands are already asking. Those move a rate more than follower count does, and they move it upward.

Why does my niche change the number so much?

Because the audience is worth a different amount per head to an advertiser, and because far fewer people can credibly make the content. A personal finance creator with thirty thousand followers can command more than a lifestyle creator with eighty thousand. Court records from one United States enforcement action showed celebrities paid between $796 and $6,774 per million followers for the same deliverable, which is a useful reminder that follower-count formulas fall apart in practice.

The number looks low. Is that right?

It may well be, and it is worth knowing why. Most published rate-card articles quote asking prices. Marketplace transaction data tells a different story: the average Instagram post is listed around $214 US and actually paid around $193, with roughly eighty per cent of all collaborations settling under $300. If your number here looks low against an article you read, the article was probably quoting what people ask rather than what they get.

Should I publish my rates publicly?

Publish a starting-from figure, not the full card. A from-price filters out the enquiries that were never going to pay, which saves you the most time. A full published card removes your ability to price by scope, which is where the money is. One line in your bio or media kit is enough.

What if a brand says it is too high?

Do not drop the number, drop the scope. Offer one hook instead of three, one aspect ratio instead of three, a thirty-day usage window instead of a year. That keeps your rate intact for the next client and teaches this one what they are actually paying for. If they still say no, their budget was smaller than the job needs, which is information rather than a failure.

Do you keep what I enter?

No. The calculator runs entirely in your browser and nothing is sent to us. If you choose to carry the results into an application, they travel in the link and you can see and edit every one of them before you submit.

Benchmark ranges, not our rate card. We do not set creator rates and we take nothing out of what a creator is paid.

A rate card is only worth having if someone reads it.

Join the roster and briefs arrive with a budget already agreed, at the rate you set. No application fee and no exclusivity.

Call (365) 440-1786Brief us